NCP Leader Sharad Pawar declined Z+ security; can any VIP do this? Here are the rules.

 

Recently, Sharad Pawar, a senior Indian politician and leader of the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), made headlines by declining the offer of Z+ security. This has raised many questions about whether a VIP can choose to refuse such high-level protection and what the rules are around this decision.

### What is Z+ Security?

Z+ security is the highest level of protection provided to VIPs in India. It involves a large number of security personnel, including specially trained commandos, bodyguards, and high-tech monitoring. This type of security is given to people who are at high risk of threats due to their position, influence, or public status.

### Why Was Sharad Pawar Offered Z+ Security?

Sharad Pawar is a well-known political figure in India. Due to his long-standing role in national politics and his influence across various political parties, he is considered to be someone who could face potential threats. The government offers Z+ security to individuals like Pawar to ensure their safety, especially if there are concerns about their security.

However, despite the risks, Pawar declined this offer. This surprised many, as not everyone would be comfortable refusing such a high level of protection.

### Can a VIP Refuse Security?

Yes, any VIP or public figure has the right to refuse security provided by the government. Security is offered based on threat assessments carried out by intelligence agencies. However, it is not mandatory for the individual to accept it. In India, the decision to accept or decline security is a personal choice.

In Sharad Pawar's case, he chose to decline the Z+ security, possibly because he felt it was unnecessary or too intrusive. Some public figures believe that having heavy security around them can create a barrier between them and the public, making it harder to interact with people openly.

### What Are the Rules Regarding VIP Security?

VIP security in India is determined by intelligence agencies, such as the Intelligence Bureau (IB), based on the level of threat a person faces. If an individual is assessed to be at high risk, the government offers different levels of security, such as X, Y, Z, Z+, and SPG (Special Protection Group). Each level provides a varying number of security personnel and protective measures.

However, the final decision to accept or reject security rests with the individual. If someone feels they do not need such protection, they can formally communicate their decision to the concerned authorities.

In most cases, once security is offered, it is reviewed periodically. If the threat level changes, the government may increase or reduce the level of protection. But at any point, the VIP can choose to opt out of the security arrangement.

### Why Do Some VIPs Decline Security?

There are several reasons why public figures may choose to decline government-provided security:

1. **Privacy Concerns**: Having security personnel constantly around can feel intrusive and restrict the personal space of the individual.

2. **Public Image**: Some VIPs want to maintain a close connection with the public and feel that heavy security makes them appear distant or unapproachable.

3. **No Perceived Threat**: Some people may feel they are not at risk, even if the threat assessment suggests otherwise.

4. **Cost**: While the government bears the cost of security, some individuals may feel uncomfortable with the amount of public money being spent on their protection.

### Conclusion

Sharad Pawar's decision to decline Z+ security is a personal one, and it highlights that even though the government may offer protection based on security assessments, individuals have the freedom to refuse it. While declining such protection is not common, it is within the rights of any VIP to make that choice.