Lawrence Bishnoi used the police station for an interview, was also provided Wi-Fi; High Court outraged.

 

Lawrence Bishnoi, a known figure in India’s criminal world, recently stirred controversy by conducting an interview while in police custody, using the station's resources, including Wi-Fi. The incident raised serious questions about the privileges granted to certain inmates and sparked strong reactions from the judiciary, especially the High Court, which expressed significant outrage.

Background of Lawrence Bishnoi

Lawrence Bishnoi is a notorious gangster with a long criminal history. He is allegedly involved in various criminal activities, including extortion and even a plot to harm Bollywood actor Salman Khan. Bishnoi has been in and out of police custody for years, as authorities investigate multiple cases against him. Despite being in custody, Bishnoi’s influence within the criminal world remains strong, and this recent incident highlights his reach and the support he appears to have, even while under arrest.

The Interview Incident: What Happened?

Reports indicate that Bishnoi used the police station as a base to conduct a media interview. Sources revealed that not only was he given the opportunity to talk freely, but he was also provided with access to Wi-Fi, making it easier for him to communicate with the outside world. The details of the interview went public quickly, sparking widespread criticism and raising concerns about the privileges granted to certain high-profile inmates.

The incident raised a number of questions. How did a detained gangster get access to a police station’s facilities in this way? Was there special treatment involved? And why did the police allow it?

High Court Reacts with Outrage

The High Court was quick to react when news of the interview spread. The court expressed serious concerns over the misuse of police resources, especially given Bishnoi’s criminal status. In the court's view, allowing an inmate like Bishnoi access to Wi-Fi and the freedom to conduct an interview within a police station reflects poorly on law enforcement standards and violates protocol. Such access gives rise to questions about potential security risks and shows possible negligence within the police force.

The High Court emphasized that the police must take responsibility for maintaining discipline and limiting privileges granted to individuals in custody. The court was particularly upset with the police’s handling of the situation, as it sets a dangerous precedent and could lead to further misuse of police resources by other inmates in custody.

Police Response and Public Backlash

Following the High Court’s response, police officials have come under intense public and judicial scrutiny. Senior police officers were asked to explain how and why the incident happened, with some reports suggesting an internal investigation to understand if any officers knowingly permitted the interview.

The public backlash has been significant. People voiced concerns about possible favoritism towards influential criminals, with many citizens feeling that such incidents undermine the credibility of the police force. Social media was filled with comments and criticisms about the perceived inequality within the system, with questions about why Bishnoi received such treatment when other detainees would never be allowed similar privileges.

The Need for Stricter Regulations

This incident has highlighted the need for stricter regulations on inmates, especially those with high-profile criminal backgrounds. The High Court urged the police department to implement stronger measures to prevent similar incidents in the future. The judiciary also suggested setting up better oversight within police stations to ensure that inmates do not receive unauthorized access to technology or privileges that could allow them to communicate outside the jail.

The court emphasized that such incidents damage public trust in the legal system and the police force. It is essential for law enforcement to establish clear protocols that prevent prisoners, especially those involved in serious criminal activities, from misusing resources intended for lawful purposes.

Conclusion

The Lawrence Bishnoi interview incident has brought to light significant issues within the system. By allowing a known criminal to conduct a media interview from a police station, and even providing him with Wi-Fi access, police officers inadvertently opened the door to criticism and backlash. The High Court’s outrage over the incident underscores the need for accountability and discipline within police stations, especially when dealing with notorious figures. This case serves as a reminder of the importance of equal treatment in the legal system, as well as the need for transparent, firm policies that prevent special privileges for certain inmates.