Justin Baldoni's Lawyer Criticizes Ryan Reynolds Over 'Deadpool & Wolverine' Scene

 

A deleted scene from the film "Deadpool & Wolverine" has sparked controversy, with Justin Baldoni's attorney, Bryan Freedman, accusing Ryan Reynolds of mocking Baldoni. In the scene, Reynolds portrays a character named Nicepool, who bears a resemblance to Baldoni, notably sporting a man bun—a hairstyle Baldoni was known for until 2023. Nicepool makes comments about a character named Ladypool, played by Blake Lively, Reynolds' real-life wife. He remarks, "She just had a baby too, and [you] can't even tell," and identifies himself as a feminist. 

Freedman contends that this portrayal trivializes serious allegations of sexual harassment made by Lively against Baldoni. He stated, "If your wife is sexually harassed, you don't make fun of Justin Baldoni. You don't make fun of the situation. You take it very seriously." 

This incident adds another layer to the ongoing legal disputes between Baldoni and Lively. In December 2024, Lively filed a sexual harassment complaint against Baldoni, alleging inappropriate behavior on the set of "It Ends With Us." She also accused Baldoni and his team of orchestrating a smear campaign against her. Baldoni has denied these allegations, labeling them as false and offensive. 

In response to the media coverage of these events, Baldoni has filed a $250 million lawsuit against The New York Times, accusing the publication of defamation. He also plans to sue Lively, intending to make their communications public. As of now, Reynolds has not publicly commented on the situation. 

The interplay between real-life legal battles and their portrayal in popular media raises questions about the responsibilities of filmmakers and actors when referencing ongoing personal disputes. Freedman emphasized the seriousness of the situation, criticizing Reynolds for turning it into a joke. 

As the legal proceedings continue, the entertainment industry and the public are closely watching the developments in this complex and sensitive matter.

The clash between Justin Baldoni and Ryan Reynolds highlights the complexity of mixing art with personal matters. While many fans see humor in scenes like the one in Deadpool & Wolverine, they may not realize the deeper implications such portrayals can have, especially when linked to ongoing legal disputes.

Legal and Public Fallout

Justin Baldoni’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, has strongly condemned the use of humor to reference serious allegations. He has emphasized the need to approach such matters with sensitivity, criticizing Reynolds for making light of his client's situation. Freedman has also hinted at possible legal action against Reynolds or the production team for defamation or character assassination if the intent to harm Baldoni’s reputation can be proven.

Meanwhile, Reynolds’ silence on the matter has left many speculating about his intentions behind the scene. Fans and critics alike are debating whether it was a simple joke blown out of proportion or a deliberate jab at Baldoni, given the ongoing disputes involving Blake Lively.

A Tense Background

Blake Lively’s accusations of sexual harassment against Baldoni have already placed immense pressure on both parties. With Lively alleging inappropriate behavior on the set of It Ends With Us and claiming Baldoni attempted to tarnish her image through a smear campaign, the case has attracted widespread media attention. Baldoni, however, continues to deny all allegations and asserts his innocence.

In December 2024, Baldoni filed a defamation lawsuit against The New York Times for its coverage of the allegations, claiming the publication had misrepresented the facts. Additionally, he has expressed intentions to make his private communications with Lively public, a move that could further intensify the legal battle.

The Industry's Role

This incident also brings to light the role of the entertainment industry in addressing sensitive topics. The use of real-life controversies in films, even subtly, can blur the lines between entertainment and personal attacks. Critics argue that filmmakers and actors have a responsibility to avoid trivializing serious issues, while others believe artistic freedom allows for addressing real-world events in creative ways.

Public Reactions

Fans have taken to social media to share their thoughts on the controversy. Some have defended Reynolds, claiming that the scene was intended as harmless fun and not a direct attack. Others have sided with Baldoni, criticizing Reynolds for being insensitive to an ongoing legal matter involving his wife.

What’s Next?

As the legal disputes and public debate continue, all eyes remain on the key players involved. Will Reynolds respond to the accusations, or will he maintain his silence? How will the lawsuits against The New York Times and Blake Lively unfold? And, most importantly, will this controversy set a precedent for how personal issues are handled in Hollywood storytelling?

Only time will tell how this situation resolves, but one thing is clear: the intersection of entertainment, personal disputes, and legal matters is more complicated than it seems.

The clash between Justin Baldoni and Ryan Reynolds highlights the complexity of mixing art with personal matters. While many fans see humor in scenes like the one in Deadpool & Wolverine, they may not realize the deeper implications such portrayals can have, especially when linked to ongoing legal disputes.

Legal and Public Fallout

Justin Baldoni’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, has strongly condemned the use of humor to reference serious allegations. He has emphasized the need to approach such matters with sensitivity, criticizing Reynolds for making light of his client's situation. Freedman has also hinted at possible legal action against Reynolds or the production team for defamation or character assassination if the intent to harm Baldoni’s reputation can be proven.

Meanwhile, Reynolds’ silence on the matter has left many speculating about his intentions behind the scene. Fans and critics alike are debating whether it was a simple joke blown out of proportion or a deliberate jab at Baldoni, given the ongoing disputes involving Blake Lively.

A Tense Background

Blake Lively’s accusations of sexual harassment against Baldoni have already placed immense pressure on both parties. With Lively alleging inappropriate behavior on the set of It Ends With Us and claiming Baldoni attempted to tarnish her image through a smear campaign, the case has attracted widespread media attention. Baldoni, however, continues to deny all allegations and asserts his innocence.

In December 2024, Baldoni filed a defamation lawsuit against The New York Times for its coverage of the allegations, claiming the publication had misrepresented the facts. Additionally, he has expressed intentions to make his private communications with Lively public, a move that could further intensify the legal battle.

The Industry's Role

This incident also brings to light the role of the entertainment industry in addressing sensitive topics. The use of real-life controversies in films, even subtly, can blur the lines between entertainment and personal attacks. Critics argue that filmmakers and actors have a responsibility to avoid trivializing serious issues, while others believe artistic freedom allows for addressing real-world events in creative ways.

Public Reactions

Fans have taken to social media to share their thoughts on the controversy. Some have defended Reynolds, claiming that the scene was intended as harmless fun and not a direct attack. Others have sided with Baldoni, criticizing Reynolds for being insensitive to an ongoing legal matter involving his wife.

What’s Next?

As the legal disputes and public debate continue, all eyes remain on the key players involved. Will Reynolds respond to the accusations, or will he maintain his silence? How will the lawsuits against The New York Times and Blake Lively unfold? And, most importantly, will this controversy set a precedent for how personal issues are handled in Hollywood storytelling?

Only time will tell how this situation resolves, but one thing is clear: the intersection of entertainment, personal disputes, and legal matters is more complicated than it seems.

The clash between Justin Baldoni and Ryan Reynolds highlights the complexity of mixing art with personal matters. While many fans see humor in scenes like the one in Deadpool & Wolverine, they may not realize the deeper implications such portrayals can have, especially when linked to ongoing legal disputes.

Legal and Public Fallout

Justin Baldoni’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, has strongly condemned the use of humor to reference serious allegations. He has emphasized the need to approach such matters with sensitivity, criticizing Reynolds for making light of his client's situation. Freedman has also hinted at possible legal action against Reynolds or the production team for defamation or character assassination if the intent to harm Baldoni’s reputation can be proven.

Meanwhile, Reynolds’ silence on the matter has left many speculating about his intentions behind the scene. Fans and critics alike are debating whether it was a simple joke blown out of proportion or a deliberate jab at Baldoni, given the ongoing disputes involving Blake Lively.

A Tense Background

Blake Lively’s accusations of sexual harassment against Baldoni have already placed immense pressure on both parties. With Lively alleging inappropriate behavior on the set of It Ends With Us and claiming Baldoni attempted to tarnish her image through a smear campaign, the case has attracted widespread media attention. Baldoni, however, continues to deny all allegations and asserts his innocence.

In December 2024, Baldoni filed a defamation lawsuit against The New York Times for its coverage of the allegations, claiming the publication had misrepresented the facts. Additionally, he has expressed intentions to make his private communications with Lively public, a move that could further intensify the legal battle.

The Industry's Role

This incident also brings to light the role of the entertainment industry in addressing sensitive topics. The use of real-life controversies in films, even subtly, can blur the lines between entertainment and personal attacks. Critics argue that filmmakers and actors have a responsibility to avoid trivializing serious issues, while others believe artistic freedom allows for addressing real-world events in creative ways.

Public Reactions

Fans have taken to social media to share their thoughts on the controversy. Some have defended Reynolds, claiming that the scene was intended as harmless fun and not a direct attack. Others have sided with Baldoni, criticizing Reynolds for being insensitive to an ongoing legal matter involving his wife.

What’s Next?

As the legal disputes and public debate continue, all eyes remain on the key players involved. Will Reynolds respond to the accusations, or will he maintain his silence? How will the lawsuits against The New York Times and Blake Lively unfold? And, most importantly, will this controversy set a precedent for how personal issues are handled in Hollywood storytelling?

Only time will tell how this situation resolves, but one thing is clear: the intersection of entertainment, personal disputes, and legal matters is more complicated than it seems.